If you do a youtube search for ‘Maricopa Election Audit’ – you will be sent to several false videos on people stonewalling or trying to prevent/hinder the audit and stop people from seeing the problems. The Maricopa County Officials don’t have router passwords and gave the election to manage to Demonion Voting Systems. Demonion had control over the elections in Maricopa, and this should clearly point to the fact that the 2020 Election was unundated with fraud.
A youtube video that shows the panic of the obstructionist Maricopa County Officials – Behizy https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D0rlqAgIGwA
Julie Green – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oFnWlCJ8994
AZ GOP – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZIH3vi4Mo6w
Question: How many other counties, cities, states had Dominion running the voting operation? Why was Microsoft SQL Manager running on the Maricopa Voting Systems? Why did disk forensics prove that the election results were deleted? The question should be open to all localities and Election Boards that allowed an ‘outside’ firm to manage the election. Your vote may have been compromised and the remedy is tighter election integrity laws, harsh penalties for people found involved with fraud, and perhaps having every citizen lining up to smack these officials with rocks in a sock to show them how badly they need to learn that stealing and cheating does not pay.
Instead of being destructive, be constructive and use your energy to push for a referendum, your local officials, to audit the vote, and insure Election Integrity is sustained for 2021, 2022 and onward. In addition, sign petitions, join in your local election process, and insure Critical Race Theory advocates are stopped in their tracks from poisoning your community.
Counter the corruption with good hard working people that are vetted and approved. Make sure they represent your views, and will push for a America First, and the best to promote values and actions for your family, children, community and will honor God first and foremost.
Technical Integrity Failsafes
- Watermarks on the Ballot so the numbers can be traced back to ‘Chain of Custody’
- Signature Matching Confirmed with Real ID showing that the person is legally allowed to vote.
- Create a field on the Ballot for a possible fingerprint – oil fingerprints leaving an impression show a valid human being.
- Voting systems are prevented from internet traffic, and the central database, and disk forensics show the vote tallies, without any ‘special triggers’ for shifting votes. This should be reviewed by a Republican, Democrat and Non-Affiliated party member for review of systems and that the actual vendor cannot be compromised.
- Hardware Security Module only allows access to the system by the three in one key model above for review.
- Camera and logging of site activity to note any shenanigans to an independent review – flow of voting, and even review of paper/mail in ballots.
- Judge of Elections and Elections staff are shown to instruct on the laws of the state and federal government in regards to laws, and if there are questions, they need to be raised with the local Board of Elections.
- Background checks for Critical Election Staff that they and their relatives are not receiving any kickbacks, bonuses, incentives to provide favoritism to a vendor – so no collusion can be found.
- Paper trails, chain of custody, and double and triple verification to show that counts of ballots are accurate and ID is correct.
- Systems that are reviewed do not have features for shifting votes, allow write in candidates, and have been tested with 5 trial runs of 10, 50, 100, 350 ballots and validated for no backdoors and available audit features to insure election integrity.
- If Voters have multiple addresses, they must note where their primary voting site is for the year, and if they shift, a 10,000 fine will be imposed if they were found to vote 2 or 3 times. Cross Municipality accountability.
- There are legislative failsafes that are being recommended during the audit in Maricopa County Arizona by the Arizona GOP, and the teams conducting an audit. Georgia, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and other states can learn about what can be done to insure Integrity in the vote as time progresses. Audits are good, sometimes taxes are audited, Security control are audited, heck if you are a ISO 9000 company, you have to get audited, and the fact that one group of people opposes audits – shows that they are concealing something, and are opposing accountability which is critical for any system to work. This same mentality is seen in the Border, Education, Enforcement, and are representative of a lawless, irresponsible, negligent group of people that will cause severe detriment to all.
If your state, city, county, borough, or locality has a question on integrity, shouldn’t audits be allowed to confirm what was done, and what can be improved? Why is there so much pushback when the laws provide for audits, but certain elected officials are resisting these requests? Would it seem odd that double checking the work that was done comes under scrutiny? I suggest that you push for the audits and follow what Maricopa County’s GOP has been doing to lead the way. Don’t settle for the same companies that were paid for their voting systems to audit these same systems with the same supply chain. Use real auditors that will look at the forensics and improve the integrity of the election process for everyone. This needs to be done, or your locality, community will fall to the corruption of the vote. This corruption is the refusal to lift a finger to examine and audit what was done in the 2020 and the 2021 Primary.